Re: with and trigger - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: with and trigger
Date
Msg-id 2699.1559143289@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: with and trigger  (Ron <ronljohnsonjr@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-general
Ron <ronljohnsonjr@gmail.com> writes:
> On 5/29/19 8:26 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> This doesn't explicitly talk about triggers, but I think our attitude
>> about the case you're discussing is that the results are unspecified.
>> If a trigger fired in one WITH arm tries to look at the table(s)
>> modified by other WITH arms, it might or might not see those changes.

> Are CTEs still optimization fences?
> https://www.2ndquadrant.com/en/blog/postgresql-ctes-are-optimization-fences/

Yes, if they contain data-modifying statements ... but that's not
relevant to the point at hand, which is that the run-time behavior
is not specified.

            regards, tom lane



pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Andreas Kretschmer
Date:
Subject: Re: with and trigger
Next
From: Julie Nishimura
Date:
Subject: Re: POSTGRES_FSM_RELATIONS CRITICAL: DB control fsm relations used:79569 of 80000 (99%)