Re: separate WAL - Mailing list pgsql-admin

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: separate WAL
Date
Msg-id 2696.1134404705@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to separate WAL  (jose fuenmayor <jafn82@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-admin
jose fuenmayor <jafn82@gmail.com> writes:
> How can I install pg_xlog (WAL) in another partition, i mean separate the
> data directory from WAL, i have a single scsi disk with four partitions
> /, /boot, /data(data for postgresql), /WAL(pg_xlog), i ve heard that by
> doing this occurs a boost in postgreSQL performance, thanks in advance
> anyone that helps me.

If there's only one physical disk spindle, there is no performance value
in spreading PG across multiple partitions on that disk --- in fact that
will likely be a net loss, because it'll force larger seek distances
between the different files the database has to access.

The common recommendation is to put WAL on a separate *physical disk*.
If you don't have multiple disks there's no advantage to be gained.

(I have seen people put WAL on a separate logical partition anyway,
because it insulates the WAL from possible out-of-disk-space conditions
in the other partitions, which is a good thing because out-of-space
is a PANIC condition for WAL but not for the main DB.  But if you're
doing it because you think you'll gain performance you are misguided.)

            regards, tom lane

pgsql-admin by date:

Previous
From: Scott Marlowe
Date:
Subject: Re: separate WAL
Next
From: Michael Fuhr
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_restore fails with postgis