Re: Trigram (pg_trgm) GIN index not used - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Trigram (pg_trgm) GIN index not used
Date
Msg-id 26936.1361462265@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Trigram (pg_trgm) GIN index not used  (Ivan Voras <ivoras@freebsd.org>)
Responses Re: Trigram (pg_trgm) GIN index not used
List pgsql-general
Ivan Voras <ivoras@freebsd.org> writes:
> I have a table with the following structure:
> ...
>  raw_data      | citext   | not null
> ...
>     "documents_raw_data_trgm" gin (raw_data gin_trgm_ops)

> I'd like to use pg_trgm for matching substrings case-insensitively, but
> it doesn't seem to use the index:

You're outsmarting yourself by using citext as the column datatype.
That causes "ilike" to be interpreted as a citext-specific operator,
which is not a member of the gin_trgm_ops operator class, so it doesn't
match this index.

I wonder whether we really need that citext-specific operator at all
... but in the meantime, if you need the column to be citext for some
other reason, I'd suggest making a gin index on raw_data::text and
then writing the query as raw_data::text ilike '%zagreb%'.

            regards, tom lane

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Merlin Moncure
Date:
Subject: Re: subselects vs WITH in views
Next
From: Merlin Moncure
Date:
Subject: Re: Trigram (pg_trgm) GIN index not used