Re: [INTERFACES] Re: thread-safe libpq and DBD::Pg - Mailing list pgsql-interfaces

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: [INTERFACES] Re: thread-safe libpq and DBD::Pg
Date
Msg-id 26919.902847103@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [INTERFACES] Re: thread-safe libpq and DBD::Pg  (Goran Thyni <goran@bildbasen.se>)
List pgsql-interfaces
Goran Thyni <goran@bildbasen.se> writes:
> * A "pure perl"-interface is useful for
>     - systems without decent C-compiler
>     - systems not supported by libpq
>           (there is already a pure TCL interface, isn't it?)

I agree that a "pure Perl" or "pure Tcl" front end would be more
easily portable than what we have.  It'd probably be slower, but
maybe not so much slower as to be a problem.

The present libpgtcl is NOT pure Tcl --- it is a C-coded Tcl extension,
besides which it is layered on top of libpq.

I think I remember someone speculating about writing a pure Tcl
front end by programming directly to the socket-level FE/BE interface,
but I haven't heard about any results.

            regards, tom lane

pgsql-interfaces by date:

Previous
From: Herouth Maoz
Date:
Subject: Re: [INTERFACES] Re: thread-safe libpq and DBD::Pg
Next
From: Hannu Krosing
Date:
Subject: Re: [INTERFACES] Re: thread-safe libpq and DBD::Pg