Re: sequences vs. synchronous replication - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: sequences vs. synchronous replication
Date
Msg-id 2683973.1640048519@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: sequences vs. synchronous replication  (Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@enterprisedb.com>)
Responses Re: sequences vs. synchronous replication  (Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@enterprisedb.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@enterprisedb.com> writes:
> OK, I did a quick test with two very simple benchmarks - simple select 
> from a sequence, and 'pgbench -N' on scale 1. Benchmark was on current 
> master, patched means SEQ_LOG_VALS was set to 1.

But ... pgbench -N doesn't use sequences at all, does it?

Probably inserts into a table with a serial column would constitute a
plausible real-world case.

            regards, tom lane



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: PublicationActions - use bit flags.
Next
From: Kyotaro Horiguchi
Date:
Subject: Re: Emit a warning if the extension's GUC is set incorrectly