Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com> writes:
> Why 10? I'd think we could come up with a slightly less arbitrary number,
Well, it's probably within an order of magnitude of the right thing ;-).
We know we don't want 1, but 100 seems awfully optimistic.
If someone can come up with a more defensible number then I'm all for
it. Greg Stark's thought about a power correction seemed interesting
too, though again far too optimistic to trust without some good math
to back it up.
regards, tom lane
