Re: pl/pgsql oddity - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: pl/pgsql oddity
Date
Msg-id 26531.1103221056@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pl/pgsql oddity  (Geoffrey <esoteric@3times25.net>)
Responses Re: pl/pgsql oddity  (Geoffrey <esoteric@3times25.net>)
List pgsql-general
Geoffrey <esoteric@3times25.net> writes:
> I don't know of any other language that permits multiple spellings for
> the same construct.  I'd be concerned with starting such a precedent.

Well, we have plenty of precedent already at the SQL language level:
ANALYZE vs ANALYSE, NOTNULL vs IS NOT NULL, and so on.

            regards, tom lane

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Michael Fuhr
Date:
Subject: Re: pl/pgsql oddity
Next
From: Jonathan Hedstrom
Date:
Subject: use pg_catalog for foreign key constraint