Re: pl/pgsql oddity - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Geoffrey
Subject Re: pl/pgsql oddity
Date
Msg-id 41C1D66A.3050701@3times25.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pl/pgsql oddity  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-general
Tom Lane wrote:
> Geoffrey <esoteric@3times25.net> writes:
>
>>I don't know of any other language that permits multiple spellings for
>>the same construct.  I'd be concerned with starting such a precedent.
>
>
> Well, we have plenty of precedent already at the SQL language level:
> ANALYZE vs ANALYSE, NOTNULL vs IS NOT NULL, and so on.

Like I said, someone would come up with some real world examples. :)  I
personally wouldn't lose too much sleep over it.

--
Until later, Geoffrey

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: use pg_catalog for foreign key constraint
Next
From: "Guy Rouillier"
Date:
Subject: Re: pl/pgsql oddity