Re: [HACKERS] Contrib modules documentation online - Mailing list pgsql-docs

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Contrib modules documentation online
Date
Msg-id 26319.1188480404@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Contrib modules documentation online  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] Contrib modules documentation online  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
List pgsql-docs
Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> writes:
> If you want to design a pluggable documentation system then go for it,
> but it's not required by what I understand is the consensus plan for
> contrib.

I thought a large part of the desire was to improve the visibility of
the contrib docs, ie, put the docs under the noses of people who have
*not* installed or even heard of the modules.  So "it's not in the docs
unless you installed it" seems counter to the point.

            regards, tom lane

pgsql-docs by date:

Previous
From: Andrew Dunstan
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Contrib modules documentation online
Next
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Contrib modules documentation online