Re: bug tracking system - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: bug tracking system
Date
Msg-id 26295.1549516835@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: bug tracking system  (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>)
Responses Re: bug tracking system
List pgsql-hackers
Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> writes:
> On Wed, Feb 06, 2019 at 10:50:51PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
>> I do have a modest proposal for improving things going forward.
>> How about, if a commit purports to fix a particular bug, that
>> we say "Fixes: https://postgr.es/m/<message-id>" in place of
>> our current habit of saying "Discussion: ...".

> Wouldn't it be the same as making the effort to have a proper
> "Reported-by" field for each actual bug fix then?

No, that'd be additional effort on top, which I'm not sure I see
a reason for.  Nobody's given a plausible reason why we need
a machine-readable way to identify the bug reporter's name from
the commit log.  And we get a fair number of reports with no name
or an obvious pseudonym, too, so how would you handle that?

            regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Fixing findDependentObjects()'s dependency on scan order (regressions in DROP diagnostic messages)
Next
From: Noah Misch
Date:
Subject: Re: Synchronize with imath upstream