Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> Ah, the problem was introduced here:
Right, it was my fault.
> The problem is that the PGAC_FUNC_PRINTF_ARG_CONTROL call was moved
> below the printf 64-bit tests. This commited patch moves
> PGAC_FUNC_PRINTF_ARG_CONTROL which is after we know AC_TRY_RUN works and
> just before printf 64-bit args are tested.
This patch breaks things in a different way: you should not have moved
the AC_LIBOBJ(snprintf) step. Also you randomly placed the arg-control
test between a chunk of code and the comment describing same.
Corrected version committed.
regards, tom lane
