Ryohei Takahashi (Fujitsu) писал(а) 2024-12-19 16:13:
> Hi
>
>
> Thank you for your advice and testing.
>
>> I think, it could be checked, if table has text fields instead of
>> numeric - we could exclude numeric conversion
>> and have the same input-output operations (really more IO-operation,
>> but
>> we need to compare)
>
> I changed the column from int to text.
> The performance becomes worse in each version,
> but the rate of the difference of duration did not change.
>
>
>> By the way, do you use prebuild Postgres versions for this test or
>> build it by yourself with the same options? I am going to use built
>> myself.
>
> In the mail in 2024-12-16 12:09:03, I used the modules which I build by
> myself.
> In the other mail, I used the modules which community provides at
> following.
> https://www.postgresql.org/download/windows/
>
>
>> Could you confirm, that you receive you results on all execution
>> orders
>> (17.0 first and 17.0 last)?
>
> In my environment, the results do not depend on order.
> (The performance of the order 16.4, 16.6, 17.0 is same as that of the
> order 17.0, 16.6, 16.4)
>
>
> Regards,
> Ryohei Takahashi
Hi!
I tested with text (CREATE UNLOGGED TABLE test (c TEXT STORAGE PLAIN)
WITH (autovacuum_enabled = off)).
Time is ~10% higher, but I also do not see strict dependence on version.
I think, antivirus can influence the performace, I did not switched it
off.
How can I help you in testing? Probably better to test and compare
result only with one quantity of clients.
For 1 client the read time of the input file has the big effect, for
many clients their concurrency overhead has
big effect. Maybe make the series of the runs with 2 or 4 clients only
and compare?
--
Best regards,
Vladlen Popolitov.
