Re: improved DefElem list processing - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: improved DefElem list processing
Date
Msg-id 25325.1473204202@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to improved DefElem list processing  (Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>)
Responses Re: improved DefElem list processing
List pgsql-hackers
Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> Here are two WIP patches to improve the DefElem list processing that is
> used by many utility commands.

> One factors out the duplicate checks, which are currently taking up a
> lot of space with duplicate code.  I haven't applied this everywhere
> yet, but the patch shows how much boring code can be saved.

I'm curious where you are on that?  I find myself needing to whack around
this processing in CREATE EXTENSION, but I don't want to create a merge
problem for you if you're close to committing.
        regards, tom lane



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Craig Ringer
Date:
Subject: Re: Let file_fdw access COPY FROM PROGRAM
Next
From: Peter Geoghegan
Date:
Subject: Re: Parallel tuplesort (for parallel B-Tree index creation)