On 2025/06/27 11:55, Shinya Kato wrote:
> I thought about the approach, and had a minor concern about the following inconsistency between the option and its
internalimplementation:
> - When the option is set to "MATCH", header_line becomes -1.
> - When the option is set to -1, it's an error.
I think this inconsistency is acceptable, since users won't encounter it directly.
Also the value -1 isn't used explicitly, i.e., it's always referenced through a macro
for "match", which keeps the code readable and understandable.
> However, your patch is clear, and it seems we don't need to worry about this concern.
> Your patch looks good to me.
Thanks for reviewing the patch! I've marked it as ready for committer.
Regards,
--
Fujii Masao
NTT DATA Japan Corporation