Re: Insertion to temp table deteriorating over time - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Insertion to temp table deteriorating over time
Date
Msg-id 25209.1166131396@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Insertion to temp table deteriorating over time  ("Steven Flatt" <steven.flatt@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Insertion to temp table deteriorating over time  ("Steven Flatt" <steven.flatt@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-performance
"Steven Flatt" <steven.flatt@gmail.com> writes:
> Regarding your other email -- interesting -- but we are vacuuming pg_class
> every hour.  So I don't think the answer lies there...

That's good, but is the vacuum actually accomplishing anything?  I'm
wondering if there's also a long-running transaction in the mix.
Try a manual "VACUUM VERBOSE pg_class;" after the thing has slowed down,
and see what it says about removable and nonremovable rows.

            regards, tom lane

pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: Ron Mayer
Date:
Subject: Re: File Systems Compared
Next
From: Alexander Staubo
Date:
Subject: Re: New to PostgreSQL, performance considerations