Re: How much expensive are row level statistics? - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: How much expensive are row level statistics?
Date
Msg-id 2506.1134428461@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: How much expensive are row level statistics?  ("Merlin Moncure" <merlin.moncure@rcsonline.com>)
Responses Re: How much expensive are row level statistics?  (Michael Fuhr <mike@fuhr.org>)
List pgsql-performance
"Merlin Moncure" <merlin.moncure@rcsonline.com> writes:
>> The cost depends on your usage patterns.  I did tests with one of
>> my applications and saw no significant performance difference for
>> simple selects, but a series of insert/update/delete operations ran
>> about 30% slower when block- and row-level statistics were enabled
>> versus when the statistics collector was disabled.

> That approximately confirms my results, except that the penalty may even
> be a little bit higher in the worst-case scenario.  Row level stats hit
> the hardest if you are doing 1 row at a time operations over a
> persistent connection.

IIRC, the only significant cost from enabling stats is the cost of
transmitting the counts to the stats collector, which is a cost
basically paid once at each transaction commit.  So short transactions
will definitely have more overhead than longer ones.  Even for a really
simple transaction, though, 30% seems high --- the stats code is
designed deliberately to minimize the penalty.

            regards, tom lane

pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: Manfred Koizar
Date:
Subject: Re: Joining 2 tables with 300 million rows
Next
From: Scott Marlowe
Date:
Subject: Re: opinion on disk speed