twoflower <standa.kurik@gmail.com> writes:
> Supposing *source* matches the /source pattern/, the $/n/ expressions inside
> the /target pattern/ correspond to the captured groups inside *source*.
> Example:
> Source: 123 source text
> Target: 123 target text
> Source pattern: ([0-9]+) source text
> Target pattern: $1 target text
> This yields a successful match since $1 in the /target pattern/ is replaced
> by "123" from the first captured group in *source* and the resulting string,
> "123 target text", matches the /target pattern/.
> I would like to execute a query which for a given /source pattern/ and
> /target pattern/ returns all rows from the *SEGMENT* table where *source*
> matches the /source pattern/ and *target* matches the /target pattern/ after
> it has its references replaced with the actual captured groups.
> I believe this is not possible since *regexp_replace* expects a string as
> its /replacement/ argument which is not enough in this case.
Well, you could pull out the source text captures with regexp_matches,
escape them somehow (don't think there's a built-in function for that),
insert them into the target pattern with regexp_replace, and then apply
the target pattern with a simple regexp match operator. Kinda tedious,
but hardly "not possible".
A lot of people feel that this sort of text-mashing requirement is best
handled in plperl, but if you don't want to use that for some reason,
it's surely possible in plpgsql.
regards, tom lane
