Re: DROP CASCADE transitive dependencies - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: DROP CASCADE transitive dependencies
Date
Msg-id 2493.1543861586@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to DROP CASCADE transitive dependencies  (C GG <cgg0007@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: DROP CASCADE transitive dependencies  (C GG <cgg0007@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-general
C GG <cgg0007@gmail.com> writes:
> ...PostgreSQL 9.5...
> `DROP SCHEMA blah;` reports all the dependent objects and advises to `DROP
> SCHEMA blah CASCADE;` ...

> Will DROP ... CASCADE traverse the entire dependency tree for each of the
> dependent objects (potentially dropping something unintended), or will it
> stop at the first level and balk at any new transitive dependencies?

The former.  However, the list of dependencies it's showing you as
potentially dropped already includes transitive dependencies; there
aren't going to be "new" ones unless somebody is adding things
concurrently.

If you're feeling paranoid, you could always do

begin;
drop ... cascade;

and then look at the reported list of objects before deciding whether
to commit or roll back.

            regards, tom lane


pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Stephen Frost
Date:
Subject: Re: Query never completes with an OR condition
Next
From: C GG
Date:
Subject: Re: DROP CASCADE transitive dependencies