Re: TIL: In pg_dump, beware the combo of "-Fd" and "-Z" - Mailing list pgsql-admin

From Adrian Ho
Subject Re: TIL: In pg_dump, beware the combo of "-Fd" and "-Z"
Date
Msg-id 249144ee-e91c-adfb-bcfa-dc1c5462e0c4@03s.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: TIL: In pg_dump, beware the combo of "-Fd" and "-Z"  (Ron <ronljohnsonjr@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: TIL: In pg_dump, beware the combo of "-Fd" and "-Z"
List pgsql-admin
On 20/1/21 5:11 am, Ron wrote:
On 1/19/21 1:55 PM, David G. Johnston wrote:
On Tuesday, January 19, 2021, Ron <ronljohnsonjr@gmail.com> wrote:

For a project using 9.6, I have this command backing up a database:
So, for the 12 project, I copied it over, removing the "0", since I want these backups compressed.

The versions in use doesn’t seem pertinent to the observation - this behavior hasn’t changed (at least in the docs).
 

Since the -Z default is "6"

It is?  Where do you see this?

https://www.postgresql.org/docs/12/app-pgdump.html

"-Z 0..9"
"the default is to compress at a moderate level."

It doesn't say "6", but every other bit of software I've used defaults to level 6.

A quick look at the `pg_dump` source code indicates that:

* `-Z` requires an argument, and

* the argument is converted to an integer with the `atoi()` C function

This means that `-Z` actually took `-v` as its argument, which `atoi()` converts to integer 0. That explains what you saw, and I'm also guessing you did NOT get verbose output from your second command.
Best Regards,
Adrian

pgsql-admin by date:

Previous
From: Ankush Chawla
Date:
Subject: Re: hot standby in Postgresql 12
Next
From: "Anjul Tyagi"
Date:
Subject: Re: Table Partitioning