Re: ACLs versus ALTER OWNER - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: ACLs versus ALTER OWNER
Date
Msg-id 24868.1086190501@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to ACLs versus ALTER OWNER  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl@familyhealth.com.au> writes:
>> Someone else suggested having pg_dump dump all objects without ownership
>> (so, on restore, they'd all initially be owned by the user running the
>> script, hopefully a superuser) and then doing ALTER OWNERs and GRANTs at
>> the bottom.

> Actually, this would probably only be reasonable if you fixed the ACLs 
> after an ALTER OWNER, like you proposed earlier.

I was envisioning pg_dump not issuing any GRANTs until after the
ALTER OWNER steps, so it really wouldn't matter whether ALTER OWNER did
anything to the ACL list; it'd still be NULL at that point anyway.
(I do, however, have every intention of fixing ALTER OWNER that way
before 7.5 freeze.)

BTW, is pg_dump careful about the order in which it issues GRANTs?
Specifically, what about being sure that chains of GRANT OPTIONs
are re-granted in a legal sequence?  I don't recall any smarts in
the code about that...
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Shridhar Daithankar
Date:
Subject: Re: Converting postgresql.conf parameters to kilobytes
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Converting postgresql.conf parameters to kilobytes