Re: and waiting - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: and waiting
Date
Msg-id 24863.1201882580@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to and waiting  ("Gurjeet Singh" <singh.gurjeet@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: and waiting  ("Gurjeet Singh" <singh.gurjeet@gmail.com>)
Re: and waiting  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
"Gurjeet Singh" <singh.gurjeet@gmail.com> writes:
>     I saw a strange behaviour on one of the production boxes. The
> pg_stat_activity shows a process as <IDLE> and yet 'waiting' !!! On top of
> it (understandably, since its IDLE), there are no entries for this pid in
> pg_locks!

Hmm, I can reproduce something like this by aborting a wait for lock.
It seems the problem is that WaitOnLock() is ignoring its own good
advice, assuming that it can do cleanup work after waiting.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "A.M."
Date:
Subject: Re: FW: bitemporal functionality for PostgreSQL
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Limit changes query plan