Re: possible wierd boolean bug? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: possible wierd boolean bug?
Date
Msg-id 24861.1103069261@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: possible wierd boolean bug?  ("Merlin Moncure" <merlin.moncure@rcsonline.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Got it: _bt_preprocess_keys is setting keys_are_unique in cases where it
shouldn't.  The test at the bottom of that routine used to be correct,
but no longer is, because the number of keys returned could be more than
the number of attributes being tested when redundant cross-data-type quals
are provided (see the comments above the routine).

A fix will be forthcoming.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Simon Riggs
Date:
Subject: Re: bgwriter changes
Next
From: Oliver Jowett
Date:
Subject: Re: 800RC1 valgrind-detected bug ?