Tom Lane said:
> Mark Kirkwood <markir@coretech.co.nz> writes:
>> It seems that the check in src/pl/plperl/plperl.c
>> eval_pv((safe_version < 2.09 ? safe_bad : safe_ok), FALSE);
>> is not working quite as expected (CVS HEAD from today):
>
> Yah know, I looked at that on Monday and said to myself "Self, that
> looks like a rounding problem waiting to happen" ... but in the absence
> of a trouble report didn't want to mess with it.
>
> Part of the problem is that Perl NV is double, not float, and so the
> declaration of safe_version is wrong on its face. But even with it
> properly declared, exact comparison of double values is playing with
> fire. I'd be inclined to change it to something like
>
> double safe_version;
> ...
> if (safe_version < 2.0899999) ...
>
Since there was no released version between 2.08 and 2.09, comparing to
2.085 should do the trick (or any of 2.08[1-9]).
cheers
andrew
