Hitoshi Harada <umi.tanuki@gmail.com> writes:
> 2010/9/15 Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>:
>> Why is it so difficult to do this correctly?
> Because INSERT INTO ... (SELECT|VALUES) is already a collection of
> kludge (as comments say). It was possible to parse the two WITHs
> separately, but it results in ambiguous naming issue;
> parseWithClause() asserts there's only one WITH clause in the Stmt and
> detects duplicated CTE name in it.
Well, I would think that the no-duplication rule applies to each WITH
list separately, not both together. If you do something like
with t1 as (select * from foo) select * from (with t2 as (select * from foo) select * from t1, t2) ss;
there's no expectation that the WITH clauses can't both define the same
name.
regards, tom lane
