Re: Possible solution for LIKE optimization - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Possible solution for LIKE optimization
Date
Msg-id 24249.997127377@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Possible solution for LIKE optimization  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> writes:
> Tom Lane writes:
>> On the other hand, LIKE *is* multibyte aware.  So the hypothetical
>> non-locale-aware comparison operators would need to be aware of
>> multibyte character sets even though not aware of locale.  And the
>> "add one" operator that we postulated for the LIKE index optimization
>> needs to be able to increment a multibyte character.

> Both of these are not hard if you know how strcmp operates.  It would also
> be irrelevant whether "add one" to a multibyte character yields another
> valid multibyte character.  strcmp doesn't care.

I imagine we can come up with a definition that makes LIKE optimization
work.  I was wondering more about Hiroshi's implied question: would such
an index have any use for sorting?  Or would the induced sort order (on
multibyte character sets) look too weird to be of any use?
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Re: AW: Re: OID wraparound: summary and proposal
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Not representable result out of too large range