Re: [Bug] Logical Replication failing if the DateStyle is different in Publisher & Subscriber - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: [Bug] Logical Replication failing if the DateStyle is different in Publisher & Subscriber
Date
Msg-id 2407667.1634827574@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [Bug] Logical Replication failing if the DateStyle is different in Publisher & Subscriber  (Japin Li <japinli@hotmail.com>)
Responses Re: [Bug] Logical Replication failing if the DateStyle is different in Publisher & Subscriber  (Japin Li <japinli@hotmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Japin Li <japinli@hotmail.com> writes:
> On Thu, 21 Oct 2021 at 19:54, Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com> wrote:
>> BTW I think we can set the parameters from the subscriber side without
>> additional network round trips by specifying the "options" parameter
>> in the connection string, no?

> Yes, we can.  However, each client should be concerned the style for
> datestyle, IMO it is boring.

There's another issue here: the subscriber can run user-defined code
(in triggers), while AFAIK the sender cannot.  People might be surprised
if their triggers run with a datestyle setting different from the
database's prevailing setting.  So while I think it should be okay
to set-and-forget the datestyle on the sender side, we could not get
away with that in the subscriber.  We'd have to set and unset for
each row, much as (e.g.) postgres_fdw has to do.

            regards, tom lane



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Justin Pryzby
Date:
Subject: Re: Assorted improvements in pg_dump
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Assorted improvements in pg_dump