Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> writes:
> There's an alternative approach we could take, which is to write in 4KB
> increments, while keeping 8KB pages. With the current format that's not
> obviously a bad idea. But given there aren't really advantages in 8KB WAL
> pages, it seems we should just go for 4KB?
Seems like that's doubling the overhead of WAL page headers. Do we need
to try to skinny those down?
regards, tom lane
