Re: Improving postgresql.conf - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Improving postgresql.conf
Date
Msg-id 24021.1087410754@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Improving postgresql.conf  (Andreas Pflug <pgadmin@pse-consulting.de>)
Responses Re: Improving postgresql.conf
Re: Improving postgresql.conf
List pgsql-hackers
Andreas Pflug <pgadmin@pse-consulting.de> writes:
> How about vars overridden on the postmaster command line? Similar issue, 
> I believe. Naively, I'd assume that my last instruction (in this case: 
> changing postgresql.conf and SIGHUP) would determine processing, which 
> is obviously wrong if I read the docs correctly.

That was another point I was about to make, which is that there are lots
of other reasons why the active value of some config variable might not
be what postgresql.conf says.  We are *not* ripping out the entire GUC
facility just because some people haven't bothered to read the
documentation about it ;-).

Maybe the real problem here is that people think that postgresql.conf
is the place to find out about current settings, and they just need to
be re-educated to look at pg_settings or SHOW ALL instead.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andreas Pflug
Date:
Subject: Re: Improving postgresql.conf
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: JOB LISTING - SRA America looking for intern/consultant