Re: State of Beta 2 - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: State of Beta 2
Date
Msg-id 23747.1064697633@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: State of Beta 2  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
Responses Re: State of Beta 2  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
List pgsql-general
Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> With all the discussion and pg_upgrade, I saw no one offer to work on
> it.
> Does someone want to convert it to Perl?  I think that would be a better
> language than shell script for this purpose, and C is too low-level.

The reason that it needs to be rewritten in C is that it needs access to
internal stuff that the backend doesn't expose.  (For example, the
transaction counter, end-of-WAL pointer, etc.)  I don't think Perl would
offer anything except creating an entirely new dependency for Postgres.
Also, C code would be easier to keep in sync with the backend code that
accesses the same stuff.

            regards, tom lane

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Lamar Owen
Date:
Subject: Re: State of Beta 2
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: State of Beta 2