> At this point I (personally) would rather not have a Win32 port at all,
> because all it is buying us under these circumstances will be bad
> reputation. We have come a long way and the fact that people do not
> reevaluate things is the reason they still "know" that PostgreSQL is
> slow and instable. Adding a bad maintained Win32 port is worse than not
> supporting Win32 at all. The latter might be missing an important
> platform, the former will build up long lasting bad reputation.
Maybe we could replace Vadim (if he was core) with a core Win32 person...?
Chris
