Re: proposal: additional error fields - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: proposal: additional error fields
Date
Msg-id 23462.1335914535@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: proposal: additional error fields  (Peter Geoghegan <peter@2ndquadrant.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Peter Geoghegan <peter@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> There is another advantage to doing this within the core system that I
> have not touched upon, which is that in this way we can expose another
> useful GUC to reduce log noise, beyond log_min_messages.

Yeah, that one is actually a pretty compelling argument.  A *lot* of
people would like to have a setting for "log only non-routine errors",
I think.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: JSON in 9.2 - Could we have just one to_json() function instead of two separate versions ?
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: proposal: additional error fields