Re: Stamping of 8.4 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Stamping of 8.4
Date
Msg-id 23409.1202936203@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Stamping of 8.4  (Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net> writes:
> * Tom Lane (tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us) wrote:
>> Minor version bump is done unconditionally for each release cycle.

> This isn't a *huge* deal, but I'm not sure it's actually appropriate.
> We should bump the minor version when we actually add something new to
> the library (which is probably just about every time we do a major
> version, but still).

Only if there were exactly zero changes would the minor version bump
be unnecessary.  I doubt that's ever happened.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: Stamping of 8.4
Next
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: Stamping of 8.4