Re: SSL renegotiation - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: SSL renegotiation
Date
Msg-id 23255.1384531099@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: SSL renegotiation  (Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com>)
Responses Re: SSL renegotiation  (Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com>)
Re: SSL renegotiation  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> On 2013-11-15 10:43:23 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Another reason I'm not in a hurry is that the problem we're trying
>> to solve doesn't seem to be causing real-world trouble.  So by
>> "awhile", I'm thinking "let's let it get through 9.4 beta testing".

> Well, there have been a bunch of customer complaints about it, afair
> that's what made Alvaro look into it in the first place. So it's not a
> victimless bug.

OK, then maybe end-of-beta is too long.  But how much testing will it get
during development?  I know I never use SSL on development installs.
How many hackers do?
        regards, tom lane



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Kevin Grittner
Date:
Subject: Re: strncpy is not a safe version of strcpy
Next
From: Dimitri Fontaine
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add transforms feature