Re: SSL renegotiation - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andres Freund
Subject Re: SSL renegotiation
Date
Msg-id 20131115160529.GD5489@awork2.anarazel.de
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: SSL renegotiation  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 2013-11-15 10:58:19 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> > On 2013-11-15 10:43:23 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> >> Another reason I'm not in a hurry is that the problem we're trying
> >> to solve doesn't seem to be causing real-world trouble.  So by
> >> "awhile", I'm thinking "let's let it get through 9.4 beta testing".
> 
> > Well, there have been a bunch of customer complaints about it, afair
> > that's what made Alvaro look into it in the first place. So it's not a
> > victimless bug.
> 
> OK, then maybe end-of-beta is too long.  But how much testing will it get
> during development?  I know I never use SSL on development installs.
> How many hackers do?

I guess few. And even fewer will actually have connections that live
long enough to experience renegotiations :/.

I wonder how hard it'd be to rig the buildfarm code to generate ssl
certificates and use them during installcheck. If we'd additionally set
a low renegotiation limit...

Greetings,

Andres Freund

-- Andres Freund                       http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training &
Services



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Dimitri Fontaine
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add transforms feature
Next
From: "Erik Rijkers"
Date:
Subject: Re: Minmax indexes (timings)