Re: SSL renegotiation - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Alvaro Herrera
Subject Re: SSL renegotiation
Date
Msg-id 20140826034613.GB6343@eldon.alvh.no-ip.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: SSL renegotiation  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: SSL renegotiation
List pgsql-hackers
Tom Lane wrote:
> Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> > On 2013-11-15 10:43:23 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> >> Another reason I'm not in a hurry is that the problem we're trying
> >> to solve doesn't seem to be causing real-world trouble.  So by
> >> "awhile", I'm thinking "let's let it get through 9.4 beta testing".
> 
> > Well, there have been a bunch of customer complaints about it, afair
> > that's what made Alvaro look into it in the first place. So it's not a
> > victimless bug.
> 
> OK, then maybe end-of-beta is too long.  But how much testing will it get
> during development?  I know I never use SSL on development installs.
> How many hackers do?

Just a reminder that I intend to backpatch this (and subsequent fixes).
We've gone over two 9.4 betas now.  Maybe it'd be a good thing if the
beta3 announcement carried a note about enabling SSL with a low
ssl_renegotiation_limit setting.

-- 
Álvaro Herrera                http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: Concurrently option for reindexdb
Next
From: Amit Kapila
Date:
Subject: Re: postgresql latency & bgwriter not doing its job