Re: Assertion failure with small block sizes - Mailing list pgsql-patches

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Assertion failure with small block sizes
Date
Msg-id 23179.1192373754@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Assertion failure with small block sizes  (Gregory Stark <stark@enterprisedb.com>)
Responses Re: Assertion failure with small block sizes
List pgsql-patches
Gregory Stark <stark@enterprisedb.com> writes:
> Testing Postgres with a small block size runs into an assertion failure when
> it tries to toast a pg_proc tuple during initdb. I think the assertion is just
> wrong and RELKIND_UNCATALOGUED is valid here.

Uh, what makes you think the assertion is the only problem?  The toast
table won't exist yet.

How small is "small" anyway?

            regards, tom lane

pgsql-patches by date:

Previous
From: Gregory Stark
Date:
Subject: Assertion failure with small block sizes
Next
From: Gregory Stark
Date:
Subject: Re: Assertion failure with small block sizes