Re: test/modules/test_oat_hooks vs. debug_discard_caches=1 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: test/modules/test_oat_hooks vs. debug_discard_caches=1
Date
Msg-id 2316565.1668827411@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: test/modules/test_oat_hooks vs. debug_discard_caches=1  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
Responses Re: test/modules/test_oat_hooks vs. debug_discard_caches=1
List pgsql-hackers
Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> writes:
> On 2022-11-18 15:55:34 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
>> We realized today [1] that it's been some time since the buildfarm
>> had any debug_discard_caches (nee CLOBBER_CACHE_ALWAYS) coverage.

> Do we know when it was covered last? I assume it's before the addition of
> test_oat_hooks in 90efa2f5565?

As far as that goes: some digging in the buildfarm DB says that avocet
last did a CCA run on 2021-10-22 and trilobite on 2021-10-24.  They
were then offline completely until 2022-02-10, and when they restarted
the runtimes were way too short to be CCA tests.

Seems like maybe we need a little more redundancy in this bunch of
buildfarm animals.

            regards, tom lane



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter Geoghegan
Date:
Subject: Re: New strategies for freezing, advancing relfrozenxid early
Next
From: Thomas Munro
Date:
Subject: More efficient build farm animal wakeup?