Re: Build farm - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Build farm
Date
Msg-id 23062.1069440468@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Build farm  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
Responses Re: Build farm
Re: Build farm
List pgsql-hackers
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> writes:
> Andrew Dunstan writes:
>> Maybe it wouldn't be of great value to PostgreSQL. And maybe it would. I
>> have an open mind about it. I don't think incompleteness is an argument
>> against it, though.

> If you want to do it, by all means go for it.  I'm sure it would give
> everyone a fuzzy feeling to see the green lights everywhere.  But
> realistically, don't expect any significant practical benefits, such
> cutting beta time by 10%.

I think the main value of a build farm is that we'd get nearly immediate
feedback about the majority of simple porting problems.  Your previous
arguments that it wouldn't smoke everything out are certainly valid ---
but we wouldn't abandon the regression tests just because they don't
find everything.  Immediate feedback is good because a patch can be
fixed while it's still fresh in the author's mind.

I'm for it ...
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: initdb segfaults - latest cvs
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: logical column position