Re: BUG #5636: extra "(" or missing ")" - Mailing list pgsql-bugs

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: BUG #5636: extra "(" or missing ")"
Date
Msg-id 23038.1283438884@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to BUG #5636: extra "(" or missing ")"  ("KOIZUMI Satoru" <koizumistr@minos.ocn.ne.jp>)
List pgsql-bugs
"KOIZUMI Satoru" <koizumistr@minos.ocn.ne.jp> writes:
> At 33.8.5. The decimal type of PostgreSQL 9.0RC1 Documentation, "(" is
> before "by means".
> But there is no ")".
> | the decimal type can be created either on the stack
> | or on the heap (by means of the functions
> | PGTYPESdecimal_new() and PGTYPESdecimal_free().

Fixed.  It seemed to me the best way was to remove the ()'s from the
function names, since that style is used elsewhere, eg in the
description of ecpg's numeric type.

            regards, tom lane

pgsql-bugs by date:

Previous
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: issue about information_schema REFERENTIAL_CONSTRAINTS
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: BUG #5638: disagreement of argument name