Re: Add index scan progress to pg_stat_progress_vacuum - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Imseih (AWS), Sami
Subject Re: Add index scan progress to pg_stat_progress_vacuum
Date
Msg-id 22C9CB0C-9576-47AF-8A6E-F9573F73CD4E@amazon.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Add index scan progress to pg_stat_progress_vacuum  ("Bossart, Nathan" <bossartn@amazon.com>)
Responses Re: Add index scan progress to pg_stat_progress_vacuum
Re: Add index scan progress to pg_stat_progress_vacuum
List pgsql-hackers
I agree, Renaming "index_vacuum_count" can be taken up in a separate discussion.

I have attached the 3rd revision of the patch which also includes the documentation changes. Also attached is a
renderedhtml of the docs for review.
 

"max_index_vacuum_cycle_time" has been removed.
"index_rows_vacuumed" renamed to "index_tuples_removed". "tuples" is a more consistent with the terminology used.
"vacuum_cycle_ordinal_position" renamed to "index_ordinal_position".

On 1/10/22, 12:30 PM, "Bossart, Nathan" <bossartn@amazon.com> wrote:

    On 1/6/22, 6:14 PM, "Imseih (AWS), Sami" <simseih@amazon.com> wrote:
    > I am hesitant to make column name changes for obvious reasons, as it breaks existing tooling. However, I think
thereis a really good case to change "index_vacuum_count" as the name is confusing. "index_vacuum_cycles_completed" is
thename I suggest if we agree to rename.
 
    >
    > For the new column, "num_indexes_to_vacuum" is good with me. 

    Yeah, I think we can skip renaming index_vacuum_count for now.  In any
    case, it would probably be good to discuss that in a separate thread.

    Nathan



Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter Smith
Date:
Subject: Re: row filtering for logical replication
Next
From: Peter Smith
Date:
Subject: Re: row filtering for logical replication