Re: [PATCH] Support % wildcard in extension upgrade filenames - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: [PATCH] Support % wildcard in extension upgrade filenames
Date
Msg-id 2297723.1682972670@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [PATCH] Support % wildcard in extension upgrade filenames  (Eric Ridge <eebbrr@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: [PATCH] Support % wildcard in extension upgrade filenames
List pgsql-hackers
Eric Ridge <eebbrr@gmail.com> writes:
> FWIW, outside of major ZDB releases, most of those have little-to-zero schema changes.  But that doesn't negate the
facteach release needs its own upgrade.sql script. I'm working on a point release right this moment and it won't have
anyschema changes but it'll have an upgrade.sql script. 

Hmm ... our model for the in-core extensions has always been that you
don't need a new upgrade script unless the SQL declarations change.

Admittedly, that means that the script version number isn't a real
helpful guide to which version of the .so you're dealing with.
We expect the .so's own minor version number to suffice for that,
but I realize that that might not be the most user-friendly answer.

            regards, tom lane



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter Geoghegan
Date:
Subject: Re: Overhauling "Routine Vacuuming" docs, particularly its handling of freezing
Next
From: Eric Ridge
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Support % wildcard in extension upgrade filenames