Re: snapper vs. HEAD - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: snapper vs. HEAD
Date
Msg-id 22825.1585590669@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: snapper vs. HEAD  ("Tom Turelinckx" <pgbf@twiska.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
"Tom Turelinckx" <pgbf@twiska.com> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> Thanks! But it doesn't seem to have taken: snapper just did a new run
>> that still failed, and it still seems to be using -O2.

> Snapper did build using -O1 a few hours ago, but it failed the check stage very early with a different error:
> FATAL:  null value in column "classid" of relation "pg_depend" violates not-null constraint

Ugh.  Compiler bugs coming out of the woodwork?

Not sure what to suggest here.  It certainly is useful to us to have
sparc buildfarm testing, but probably sparc64 would be more useful
than sparc32.  (It looks like FreeBSD and OpenBSD have dropped sparc32
altogether, and NetBSD has bumped it to tier II status.)  One idea
is to try -O0 ...

            regards, tom lane



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: snapper vs. HEAD
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: fix for BUG #3720: wrong results at using ltree