Re: costly foreign key ri checks (4) - Mailing list pgsql-patches

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: costly foreign key ri checks (4)
Date
Msg-id 22706.1079361119@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: costly foreign key ri checks (4)  (Fabien COELHO <coelho@cri.ensmp.fr>)
List pgsql-patches
Fabien COELHO <coelho@cri.ensmp.fr> writes:
> I'll keep that in mind. However, from other projects I've worked on, I
> found that large regression tests are not wasted.

> Maybe two level of tests wouldn't be bad, as when you're about to release
> a new version, it's better to pass large tests, but when installing some
> light checks are enough just to check that all functionnalities are there.
> I think I already saw something like that somewhere in the sources?

There is a provision for "big tests" in the regression test
infrastructure.  The only additional test at present is a rerun of the
numeric test with greater precision choices; which personally I think is
quite useless.  But we could imagine using the mechanism for other stuff.

            regards, tom lane

pgsql-patches by date:

Previous
From: Tatsuo Ishii
Date:
Subject: Re: client side syntax error position (v3)
Next
From: Fabien COELHO
Date:
Subject: hint infrastructure setup (v1)