Rene Pijlman <rene@lab.applinet.nl> writes:
> Reading the book "Understanding the SQL standard" it seems that
> what the standard calls a schema is a database in PostgreSQL. A
> catalog is a set of schemas. Following the standard, a session
> is supposed to have access to a catalog, but in PostgreSQL it
> has access to a database.
> Perhaps this feature has not yet been implemented because of
> such fundamental mapping problems.
I think it'd be a mistake to expend much effort on this issue in JDBC
right now. We will eventually implement SQL92-compliant schemas in the
backend, and once that happens it'll be possible to do something
reasonable with the catalog metadata routines in JDBC. If you try
to make a half-usable implementation now, you'll just create backwards-
compatibility issues for the real implementation later. So my counsel
is: acknowledge that it's broken, but ignore it for now.
When is "eventually"? Possibly 7.3, but I can't promise anything...
regards, tom lane
