Re: Function execution costs 'n all that - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Function execution costs 'n all that
Date
Msg-id 22609.1168893991@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Function execution costs 'n all that  (Neil Conway <neilc@samurai.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Neil Conway <neilc@samurai.com> writes:
> BTW, your proposal would still pushdown all qualifiers, right?

Yeah, I have no intention of readopting xfunc in the near future ...
especially seeing that it's possible for the user to force that
sort of thing if he really has to.
SELECT * FROM (SELECT ... OFFSET 0) ss    WHERE expensive_function(...);
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: xml type and encodings
Next
From: markwkm@gmail.com
Date:
Subject: Re: ideas for auto-processing patches