Re: Sync scan & regression tests - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Sync scan & regression tests
Date
Msg-id 224955.1691361049@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Sync scan & regression tests  (Konstantin Knizhnik <knizhnik@garret.ru>)
List pgsql-hackers
Konstantin Knizhnik <knizhnik@garret.ru> writes:
> Is it is ok, that regression tests do not pass with small value of 
> shared buffers (for example 1Mb)?

There are quite a few GUC settings with which you can break the
regression tests.  I'm not especially bothered by this one.

> More general question - is it really good that in situation when there 
> is actually no concurrent queries, seqscan is started not from the first 
> page?

You're going to have race-condition issues if you try to make that
(not) happen, I should think.

            regards, tom lane



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter Geoghegan
Date:
Subject: Re: Use of additional index columns in rows filtering
Next
From: Thomas Munro
Date:
Subject: Re: Sync scan & regression tests