Re: why not using a mountpoint as PGDATA? - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Joe Conway
Subject Re: why not using a mountpoint as PGDATA?
Date
Msg-id 2235949b-a1a6-662f-d4b1-23d5fc10d182@joeconway.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: why not using a mountpoint as PGDATA?  ("Peter J. Holzer" <hjp-pgsql@hjp.at>)
Responses Re: why not using a mountpoint as PGDATA?
List pgsql-general
On 2/27/19 11:49 AM, Peter J. Holzer wrote:
> On 2019-02-27 10:42:12 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Luca Ferrari <fluca1978@gmail.com> writes:
>> > On Wed, Feb 27, 2019 at 12:33 PM Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> You can see most obvious reasons at
>> >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1247477
> [...]
>> The case that I can recall most clearly was actually in the other
>> direction: during system bootup, some NFS volume that was being abused
>> this way (mount point == data dir) was slow to mount.  Compounding the
>> problem, postgres was being started through some init script that would
>> helpfully run initdb if it saw the specified data directory was empty.
>> So, rather than failing like a properly paranoid DBA would wish, it
>> ran initdb and then started the postmaster.
>
> Ouch.
>
> I wonder though why that directory was writable by the postgres user.
> But maybe the helpful start script chown'ed it to fix the "wrong"
> permissions.

FWIW, if you want to read the whole gory details of that incident, here
it is:

https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/41D04FA4.7010402%40joeconway.com#dfc38927745e238d49569ffd5b33beba

Joe

--
Crunchy Data - http://crunchydata.com
PostgreSQL Support for Secure Enterprises
Consulting, Training, & Open Source Development


Attachment

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Stephen Eilert
Date:
Subject: Re: cannot execute VACUUM during recovery
Next
From: Derek Hans
Date:
Subject: Re: Update does not move row across foreign partitions in v11