Joe Conway <mail@joeconway.com> writes:
> On 03/05/2018 11:19 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Joe, I wonder if you could add "log_autovacuum_min_duration = 0" to
>> rhinoceros' extra_config options, temporarily? Correlating that log
>> output with the log_statement output from the test proper would let
>> us confirm or deny whether it's autovacuum.
> Done just now. Do you want me to force a run?
Both of these runs
https://buildfarm.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/show_log.pl?nm=rhinoceros&dt=2018-03-05%2020%3A35%3A00
https://buildfarm.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/show_log.pl?nm=rhinoceros&dt=2018-03-05%2021%3A45%3A02
appear to exonerate autovacuum, and the second seems to destroy the
behind-the-scenes-ANALYZE theory entirely, since there was no change
in the outputs of the extra instrumentation queries. (In theory
there's a window for ANALYZE to have occurred in between, but that's
not very credible.)
So you can revert the rhinoceros config change if you like --- thanks
for making it so quickly!
Meanwhile, I'm back to wondering what could possibly have affected
the planner's estimates, if pg_proc and pg_statistic didn't change.
I confess bafflement ... but we've now eliminated the autovacuum-
did-it theory entirely, so it's time to start looking someplace else.
I wonder if something in the postgres_fdw remote join machinery
is not as deterministic as it should be.
regards, tom lane
