Re: Problems with autovacuum - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Problems with autovacuum
Date
Msg-id 22047.1243382359@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Problems with autovacuum  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>)
Responses Re: Problems with autovacuum  (Scott Marlowe <scott.marlowe@gmail.com>)
Re: Problems with autovacuum  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>)
List pgsql-performance
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com> writes:
> However I think there's a bigger problem here, which is that if the user
> has set naptime too low, i.e. to a value lower than
> number-of-databases * 100ms, we'll be running the (expensive)
> rebuild_database_list function on each iteration ... maybe we oughta put
> a lower bound on naptime based on the number of databases to avoid this
> problem.

Bingo, that's surely exactly what was happening to the OP.  He had 2000
databases and naptime at (I assume) the default; so he was rerunning
rebuild_database_list every 100ms.

So that recovery code path needs some more thought.  Maybe a lower bound
on how often to do rebuild_database_list?  And/or don't set adl_next_worker
to less than 100ms in the future to begin with?

            regards, tom lane

pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: Dave Page
Date:
Subject: Re: Hosted servers with good DB disk performance?
Next
From: Greg Smith
Date:
Subject: Re: Hosted servers with good DB disk performance?