Re: Performance regression with PostgreSQL 11 and partitioning - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Performance regression with PostgreSQL 11 and partitioning
Date
Msg-id 22021.1529974394@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Performance regression with PostgreSQL 11 and partitioning  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>)
Responses Re: Performance regression with PostgreSQL 11 and partitioning
List pgsql-hackers
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> On 2018-Jun-18, David Rowley wrote:
>> I've attached a patch which cleans up my earlier version and moves the
>> setup of the append_rel_array into its own function instead of
>> sneaking code into setup_simple_rel_arrays(). I've also now updated
>> the comment above find_childrel_appendrelinfo(), which is now an
>> unused function.

> I checked that this patch fixes the originally reported performance
> regression.
> Unless there are objections, I intend to push this patch tomorrow.

If find_childrel_appendrelinfo is now unused, we should remove it.

            regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Jeff Janes
Date:
Subject: Re: Scariest patch tournament, PostgreSQL 11 edition
Next
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: Incorrect fsync handling in pg_basebackup's tar_finish